Consent Form
Consent Form Readability
Recent changes to the Federal Regulations governing human subject research (the “Common Rule”) have included a focus on improving the readability of consent forms and include regulations requiring understandable language, and organization and presentation of information that facilitates understanding.
In response to these requirements, beginning October 31, 2019, consent forms must satisfy minimum readability standards. We are working on a way to receive proof of PRISM training. Therefore, until further notice, we are not requiring physical proof, but written assurance.
Though we expect to extend the standard to other sections, initially only the readability of the Invitation and Summary section will be assessed.
This section must have Flesch Kincaid reading level ≤8 and Flesch Reading Ease ≥60. Readability may be scored within the RSS application by clicking on the “Readability” button.
CFs not meeting these minimum readability measures will be returned to the investigator for modification.
To assist investigators and their staff in developing necessary skills to write effective consent forms, the PI and the person responsible for writing the consent form, must complete online training through PRISM (Program for Readability in Science and Medicine). The hour-long training covers health literacy and readability, plain language strategies and examples, and interactive editing examples and exercises.
For more information on process, readability standards, and readability tips, see below.
Readability Assessment Process:
-
Readability can be assessed within the RSS application by clicking on the “Readability” button. This will open a new page with assessments of Flesch-Kincaid reading level and Flesch Reading Ease for the invitation and summary section.
In computing reading levels, technical terms (especially drug names and names of medical procedures) may unavoidably adversely affect the score. You may choose to use the name once, and then say "the test drug" or "the operation" subsequently. However, in all cases, an effort should be made to use a simpler word or phrase.
The IRB recognizes that sections of some consent forms may be of such a technical nature that it may not be possible to keep to an 8th grade reading level. In these situations, the invitation and summary at least must meet the standard described above, and the investigator must describe what additional tactics will be used to assure and assess comprehension.
Readability Standards:
- The Flesch–Kincaid readability tests are readability tests designed to indicate how difficult a passage in English is to understand. There are two tests, the Flesch Reading Ease, and the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level. Although they use the same core measures (word length and sentence length), they have different weighting factors.
Tips for writing readable Consent Forms:
- PRISM online training is a web-based plain language tutorial for research professionals, including scientists, research staff, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), or communications staff. The hour-long training covers health literacy and readability, plain language strategies and examples, and interactive editing examples and exercises.
Do/Do Not
Readability Examples and Templates: Invitation and Summary Template Invitation and Summary Sample 1 (Phase I Oncology Drug) Invitation and Summary Sample 2 (QOL Oncology) Invitation and Summary Sample 3 (Phase III Drug) Invitation and Summary Sample 4 (Knee Replacement)